JUST IN: The Supreme Court Hears Trump’s Travel Ban, Decides To…

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 01: Seated from left, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, and Associate Justice Stephen Breyer. Standing behind from left, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Samuel Alito Jr., Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch pose for a portrait in the east conference room of the building of the Supreme Court of the United States on Thursday June 01, 2017 in Washington, DC (Photo by Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

President Donald Trump’s travel ban just won a big legal victory by the Supreme Court.

The nation’s highest court agreed with a lower court’s decision to enforce the ban.

Per the Daily Caller:

The U.S. Supreme Court stayed a lower court ruling which narrowed enforcement of President Donald Trump’s travel ban, handing the administration another victory on a signature immigration policy initiative.

As a result of the order, some 25,000 refugees are temporarily barred from resettlement in the U.S.

The court’s decision allowed exemptions to refugee resettlement and clarified what relationships refugees could have to gain access to the U.S.:

The dispute concerned the reach of the high court’s June ruling, which allowed the president’s order to take partial effect. Though the ruling allows the president to suspend the Department of State’s refugee resettlement program for 120 days, it also provides that refugees with a “bona fide” relationship to a person or entity in the U.S. be permitted entry.

In establishing guidance for enforcement of the travel ban, the Trump administration concluded that refugees who had received assurances of assistance from resettlement agencies in the U.S. did not have a sufficiently strong relationship with an American entity to warrant exemption from the ban. A coalition of states and civil rights groups challenged the guidance, arguing the Supreme Court’s order extends to this group of refugees.

Oral arguments for the travel ban will be held next month:

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the administration last Thursday, prompting the Department of Justice to appeal to the Supreme Court. The 9th Circuit’s order requires the administration to admit refugees contracting with resettlement agencies beginning Tuesday. That ruling is now stayed pending further action by the high court.

The justices will hear argument on the merits of the president’s travel ban on Oct. 10.